Legal Opinion
Welker v. LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL J. HORWITZ
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 25, 2010No. 3:08-cr-02259PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[Doc. No. 36]
IRMA E. GONZALEZ, Chief Judge.
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Erica Welker’s Motion for Summary Judgement. Having considered the parties’ arguments, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion in its entirety.
BACKGROUND
Defendant Daniel J. Horwitz is an attorney engaged in collecting unpaid debts for creditors, including the Ambulatory Care Surgery Center. On October 2, 2008, De fendant sent Welker a dunning letter, 1 indicating that the Ambulatory Care Surgery Center retained his office to collect…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Isham v. Gurstel, Staloch & Chargo, P.A.District Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- Bicking v. Law Offices of Rubenstein and CoganDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- LaRocque v. TRS Recovery Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2012
- Davis v. Hollins LawDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Chadwick v. Bonneville Billing and CollectionsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.