Legal Opinion
Isham v. Gurstel, Staloch & Chargo, P.A.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 7, 2010No. CV 09-0758-PHX-DKDPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID K. DUNCAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Currently pending before the Court are motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Dorothy L. Isham (“Isham”) filed a motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. # 44), and Defendant Gurstel, Staloch & Chargo, P.A. (“Gurstel”) filed a response and cross-motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 46). The parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (Doc. #4, 8 and 9). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment. Furthermore, the Court…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Christ Clomon v. Philip D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- James A. Swanson, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Southern Oregon Credit Service, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Strouse v. Enhanced Recovery Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Riding v. Cach LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Helen Davis v. Nationwide Capital Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026
- Jackson v. First Financial Investment Fund VDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
- McNair v. Maxwell & Morgan PCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.