Legal Opinion

Haupt v. Heaps

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 14, 2005No. 20040296-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION (For Official Publication)

McHUGH, Judge:

¶ 1 Robert Haupt appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Defendant David Heaps on Haupt’s complaint for common law fraud. Haupt filed this appeal, claiming that the trial court erred by excluding certain evidence and by incorrectly instructing the jury. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Authorize.Net was established in 1996 to provide Internet merchants with the ability to process online credit card transactions. Although such transactions are routine today, at that time credit card processing over the Internet was a new concept.

¶3 Authorize.Net hired…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  2. Gunn Hill Dairy Properties, LLC v. Los Angeles Department of Water & PowerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  3. STEVENSEN 3RD EAST, LC v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  4. Balderas v. StarksCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  5. OLP, LLC v. BurninghamCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API