Meta v. Target Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DONALD C. NUGENT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on two motions: (1) Defendant Target Corporation’s (“Target”) Partial Motion to Dismiss (ECF # 17);. and (2) Defendant Nice-Pak Products, Inc.’s (“Nice-Pak”) Partial Motion to Dismiss Counts (l)-(5) (ECF # 19). Plaintiff has responded to the motions, and Defendants Target and Nice-Pak have replied. Accordingly, the motions are ripe for consideration. For the reasons explained herein below, Defendant Target’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and Defendant Nice-Pak’s motion is GRANTED IN…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Courie v. Alcoa Wheel & Forged ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- LaPuma v. Collinwood ConcreteOhio Supreme Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Benedettini Cabinets, L.P. v. Sherwin-Williams CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
- Craig v. Gree USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- DEFRANK v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Dates v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Heide v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.