Legal Opinion

Heide v. Ethicon, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 20, 2020No. 4:20-cv-00160Unknown

1Opinion

PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CHERYL M. HEIDE, ) ) CASE NO. 4:20CV160 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON ) ETHICON, INC., et al., ) ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND Defendants. ) ORDER [Resolving ECF No. 21] ) Pending is Defendants Ethicon, Inc.’s and Johnson & Johnson’s' motion for partial summary judgment. ECF No. 21. Plaintiff Cheryl M. Heide has submitted a brief in opposition. ECF No. 23. For the reasons explained below, Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. Introduction A. Procedural History This matter is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API