Legal Opinion

Irwin & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 22, 1911No. 638PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7165 (T. D. 31294)-

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The merchandise involved in this- case consists of metal erasers, which are well-known articles for desk use, falling in a general way under the head of stationery supplies. They are composed of fixed or rigid metal- blades set into handles of wood or other material.

The importation was entered under the tariff act of 1909, and the collector classified the articles as “erasers,”-under paragraph 152 of that act, and assessed the duty accordingly.

*297The importers protested against this classification- and contended that the erasers in question did not come within the terms of that paragraph,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Markell v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. Lehn & Fink Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. Schneider Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. E. M. Stevens Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Acme Pallet Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API