Legal Opinion

Acme Pallet Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 13, 1962No. C.D. 2378PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LawRENCe, Judge:

The importation in controversy is described on tbe invoice attached to the consumption entry as “Lbet (Normal) Twist Wire Nails No. 12 x 214" Drive Screw type, Cement coated, Chisel Point Nails.”

The collector of customs classified the merchandise as “Other iron or steel nails, nspf,” and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 1.3 cents per pound, as provided in paragraph 331 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 331), as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108.

Plaintif…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lehn & Fink Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. Schneider Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Irwin & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Industrial Export Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Acme Pallet Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  3. Banton Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API