Legal Opinion

Schneider Bros. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 25, 1926No. 2659PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The merchandise imported in this case consists of two cases of rusty steel chains, entered as old junk, under paragraph 1601 of the free list of the Tariff Act of 1922. It was classified as “iron chains less than five-sixteenths of an inch in diameter,” under paragraph 329 of said act. The Board of General Appraisers sustained this classification and the importers appeal, claiming here, that “ diameter,” as used in said paragraph, refers to the antecedent “chains,” and not to the material of which they are made, and that the chains imported, being not less than three-eighths of an inch “in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lehn & Fink Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. Irwin & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Markell v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. Acme Pallet Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Henry Greenberg & Bros. Export & Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Henry Greenberg & Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. Schoemann & Mayer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API