McClellan v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
JOYCE, District Judge.
Defendant moves for summary judgment herein on the grqund that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; or, in the alternative, if summary judgment is not granted, that the court ascertain what material facts are controverted.
The complaint alleges that Capital Gas Corporation, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, is a Montana corporation owning or controlling during the period 1930 until 1940 gas properties and production capable of producing in excess of 200,000,000 cubic feet of gas per day, open…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lamb Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Wonderland Ventures, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. The Toledo Blade CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Marion County Co-Op. Ass'n v. Carnation Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
- River Plate and Brazil Conferences v. Pressed Steel Car Company, Inc., Federal Maritime Board, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Glassberg v. BoydCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1955
- Denver Petroleum Corporation v. Shell Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.