Legal Opinion

Hupe v. Sommer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1913No. 17,919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Pottawatomie district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Henry Hupe sued George Sommer, alleging that the defendant, as township trustee, had contracted with him for the building of a drainage ditch. He sought to hold the defendant personally liable for his pay. An answer and reply were filed. Upon the case being called for trial the defendant objected to the introduction of any evidence on the ground that the petition failed to state a cause of action. The objection was sustained and judgment was rendered against the plaintiff, from which he appeals.

A township trustee under the statute has…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Amy v. The SupervisorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rld. v. Comm'rs of Jefferson Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  3. City of Leavenworth v. MillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  4. Dow v. HumbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. KaulSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Glover v. FongHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Severns Paving Co. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Eberhardt Construction Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Means v. DierksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  5. Dixie Tank & Bridge Co., a Corporation v. County of Orange, a County of the State of California, and Willis H. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API