Legal Opinion
Means v. Dierks
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1950No. 3979_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
Jay Means and Wilma Means, residents of the State of Missouri, brought this action against Dierks to recover the value of one-fourth of a wheat crop raised on a quarter section of land owned by them in Kearney County, Kansas, together with the cost of transporting to an elevator other wheat belonging to plaintiffs. From a judgment in favor of the defendant denying plaintiffs’ right to the crop share, this appeal was taken.
The material facts are generally undisputed. Dierks, for a number of years prior to 1945, had leased two quarter sections of land belonging to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Loudon v. Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Kidder v. GreenmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Girard Insurance & Trust Co v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Minick v. Associates Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Willey v. GouldingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Chrysler Corporation, Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Chrysler Corporation, Appeal of Computer Systems of America, Inc., Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Union Mutual Life Insurance v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Matter of Allbrand Appliance & Television Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Austin v. MontgomeryMississippi Supreme Court · 1976
- Gruening v. DonaldsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953