Legal Opinion
Employees Committed for Justice v. Eastman Kodak Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 15, 2008No. 04-CV-6098PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
JONATHAN W. FELDMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Preliminary Statement
Before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion to compel (Docket #288) which seeks resolution of two privilege issues. Both issues stem from arguments made by Kodak in opposition to plaintiffs’ pending motion for class certification. The matter has been fully briefed and extensive oral argument was heard by this Court on Friday, May 9, 2008. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs’ motion to compel is denied in part and granted in part. Each issue is addressed separately below.
I. The Siskin Statistical Analyses
R…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings John Doe Co. v. United States of America, Movant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Hardy v. New York News Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- B.C.F. Oil Refining, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Newmarkets Partners, LLC v. Sal. Oppenheim Jr. & Cie. S.C.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Yeda Research & Development Co. v. Abbott GmbH & Co. KGCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Dish Network, L.L.C.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2013
- Curtis v. Lever Up Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- Garrigan v. BowenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.