Legal Opinion
United States v. Verduchi
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 11, 2006No. 05-1950PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Circuit Judge.
As framed by the parties, this case raises a question about whether the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), in its Rhode Island incarnation, R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 6-16-1 to -12, restricts a court, in setting aside a fraudulent conveyance, to awarding against the transferee a money judgment that is limited to the value of the property at the time of the transfer.
On May 14, 1992, Rosalina Verduchi and her husband Coriolano (“Cal”) transferred their home at 10 Chestnut Street, North Providence, to their son, Dennis, for no consideration. The problem was that they made this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Commissioner v. SternSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frank Sawyer Trust of May 1992 v. Commissioner of Internal RevenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Geo-Seis Helicopters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Dahar v. Jackson (In Re Jackson)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Bakwin v. MardirosianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Schussel v. WerfelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.