Legal Opinion
Bakwin v. Mardirosian
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 2, 2014PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.
The plaintiff in the civil action below, having prevailed on the merits of his claims in Superior Court, appealed the form of the judgment ordered by the trial judge with respect to the remedies granted against certain relief defendants2 pursuant to the plaintiffs claims under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), G. L. c. 109A. We granted the plaintiff’s application for direct appellate review, and we affirm in part and reverse in part.
1. Background. This case arises out of a thirty-year-old art theft in Berkshire County and the plaintiff’s eventual recovery of seven stolen paintings…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Lasich v. Estate of Wickstrom (In Re Wickstrom)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990
- Coraccio v. Lowell Five Cents Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Tavenner v. SmootCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Arthur D. Little, Inc. v. East Cambridge Savings BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Foisie v. Worcester Polytechnic Inst.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Timothy v. Pia, Anderson, Dorius, Reynard & Moss LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- In re DickeyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Cruickshank v. Dixon (In re Blast Fitness Grp., LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Zimmerling v. Affinity Financial Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.