Legal Opinion

Cuno Inc. v. Pall Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 2, 1987No. CV 86-3197 (JBW)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

DAVID F. JORDAN, United States Magistrate.

This is a de novo motion by plaintiff, Cuno Incorporated, to compel inspection of Pall’s manufacturing facilities and for the attorney fees associated with the motion.

The decision is based upon the following documents:

1. Motion de novo by plaintiff with supporting Memorandum of Law dated March 6, 1987.

2. Scheduling Order of Magistrate Jordan dated March 9, 1987.

3. Defendants’ opposition dated March 19, 1987.

4. Reply Memorandum of Law dated March 30, 1987.

5. Letter of April 3, 1987, from defendants’ counsel.

6. Letter of April 7, 1987,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Dairy Products Corp. v. L. D. Schreiber & Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
  2. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nippon Carbide Industries Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  3. Bio-Vita, Ltd. v. Biopure Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  4. McConkey v. The Churchill School and CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
  5. Seeley International PTY LTD v. MaisotsenkoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API