Legal Opinion
Bio-Vita, Ltd. v. Biopure Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 17, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 90-12688-TPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TAURO, District Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
This action arises out of a series of written agreements entered into between petitioner Bio-Vita, Ltd. and respondent Bio-pure Corporation (“Biopure”) and Biopure Associates Limited Partnership (“BALP”)2 on January 29, 1990 (the “January Agreements”).3 The underlying purpose of the January Agreements was to finance and promote the research, development, and marketing of Hemopure, a human blood substitute.4
On August 24, 1990, Biopure and BALP rescinded the January Agreements. On November 8, 1990, Bio-Vita filed a six count complaint alleging breach…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dart Industries Company, Inc., Movant-Appellee v. Westwood Chemical Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Huynh v. WerkeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
- Reilly Tar & Chemical Corp. v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
- Bio-Vita, Ltd. v. RauschDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Laxalt v. McClatchyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bell v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2004
- Lawrence Arms Associates v. Shur (In re Shur)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Pullman Arms, Inc. v. Maura Healey, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of MassachusettsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019