Legal Opinion

Tue Ngoc Hoang v. California State Board of Pharmacy

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 2014No. G049275PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff Tue Ngoc Hoang, a pharmacist doing business as Orange Pharmacy (Orange), appeals from a judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandate. The petition sought to overturn a decision by defendant California State Board of Pharmacy revoking plaintiff’s pharmacy license and Orange’s permit to operate a pharmacy. Plaintiff argues defendant’s decision was unduly harsh, not supported by the findings, and denied him due process. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff held a pharmacy license issued by defendant and was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. JKH Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Gore v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Cassidy v. California Board of AccountancyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sternberg v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. IV Solutions v. Cal. Board of Pharmacy CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Oduyale v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API