Legal Opinion
Enrico Fouch v. Bicknell Supply Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 21, 2014No. A13A2252Published
1Opinion of the Court
SECOND DIVISION BARNES, P. J., MILLER and RAY, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ March 21, 2014 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A13A2252. FOUCH v. BICKNELL SUPPLY COMPANY et al. MI-118 MILLER, Judge. Enrico Fouch was diagnosed with silicosis and ultimately received a double- lung transplant due to his overexposure to silica sand while he worked for approximately 11 years as a sandblaster. Fouch subsequently filed suit against Mine Safety…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Chrysler Corp. v. BattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Talley v. City Tank Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.