Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dibello v. Barnes Page Wire Products, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 18, 2001No. AC 20612Published

1DissentFlynn, J.

While I concur with the majority that the board’s ruling as to the defendant ITT Hartford Group, Inc., should be affirmed, I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority as to the board’s ruling concerning the defendant Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (Aetna), and would reverse the board’s ruling as to it.

The judicial construction of provisions of our Workers’ Compensation Act is guided by long established principles. “[T]he Workers’ Compensation Act is remedial and must be interpreted liberally to achieve its humanitarian purposes.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Gil v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Marchiatello v. Lynch Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  3. Gil v. Courthouse OneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Grabowski v. MiskellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  5. Travelers Insurance v. HendricksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API