Legal Opinion
United States v. Heatley
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 12, 1998No. S11 96 Cr. 515(SS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SOTOMAYOR, District Judge.
Defendant Clarence Heatley challenges the superseding indictment in this case on several grounds, all of which stem from a series of proffer sessions in which Heatley made various inculpatory statements. Heatley moves for either dismissal of the indictment or an order directing the United States to grant Heatley a cooperation agreement. For the reasons to be discussed, the Court denies Heatley’s motion.
BACKGROUND
The following constitute the Court’s findings of fact, as shown by a preponderance of the evidence. Defendant Clarence Heatley was indicted…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- United States v. Rolando Aleman, Francisco RosarioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. HaakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Khalil v. Farash Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2006
- United States v. ParraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.