Legal Opinion

Baxter Homeowners Ass'n v. Angel

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 2013No. DA 12-0301PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 This matter comes before the Court on cross-appeals of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court’s orders reversing the Human Rights Commission’s finding of discrimination and award of $6,000 damages to Geoffrey Angel and denying both parties’ requests for attorneys’ fees. We affirm the District Court’s orders. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether Angel possessed proper standing to file a complaint of discrimination on behalf of his unidentified and potential clients. We hold that he did not.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶2 Geoffrey Angel, a Bozeman, Montana, attorney, rented…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Kowalski v. TesmerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Freilich v. Upper Chesapeake Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  5. Armstrong v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Larson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Schoof v. NesbitMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Molnar v. FoxMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. LeMond v. Yellowstone Development, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Planned Parenthood v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2024

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API