Legal Opinion

Molnar v. Fox

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2013No. DA 12-0373PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Brad Molnar (Molnar) appeals from the order of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Political Practices (the Commissioner) holding that Molnar violated the Code of Ethics. We affirm and address the following issues:

¶2 1. Did the District Court err by concluding that Fox had legal standing to file ethics complaints against Molnar?

¶3 2. Did the District Court err by concluding that Molnar received unlawful gifts in violation of§ 2-2-104, MCA?

¶4 3. Did the District Court err by concluding that Molnar improperly used State facilities for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of San Diego v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Sports Shooting Ass'n v. State, Mt. Dept. of FwpMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Montana Power Co. v. Montana Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Montana Automobile Ass'n v. GreelyMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Williamson v. Montana Public Service Commission & Northwestern EnergyMontana Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. B. Brown v. G. GianforteMontana Supreme Court · 2021
  2. NorthWestern Corp. v. Montana Department of Public Service RegulationMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Planned Parenthood v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Weems v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Fish v. Trap Free Mont. Pub. LandsMontana Supreme Court · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API