Legal Opinion

Neely-Towner Motor Co. v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 23, 1951No. 16606PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hays

This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Mike Fontana, the claimant, on March 16, 1950, sustained injuries when he fell from a building being constructed on the property of plaintiff in error, Neely-Towner Motor Company. He was awarded compensation by the Industrial Commission; the award was sustained by the trial court, and the cause is presented here for review by writ of error. Plaintiffs in error contend that the judgment should be reversed and claimant’s award for compensation set aside for two reasons: (1) That claimant is an independent contractor and not an employee…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. BonfilsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Lackey v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  3. Comerford v. CarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. Hoshiko v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  5. Kamp v. DisneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heckman v. WarrenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  2. Dana's Housekeeping v. ButterfieldColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API