Legal Opinion

Dana's Housekeeping v. Butterfield

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1990No. 89CA2132PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DUBOFSKY.

Dana’s Housekeeping (Dana’s), employer, seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) determining that Sandra W. Butterfield, claimant, was its employee within the meaning of the Workers’ Compensation Act when she was injured. We affirm.

In April 1988, claimant, while working as a domestic at the private home of a Dana’s client, fell down a flight of stairs and in jured her left ankle and upper back. She immediately reported this injury to an employee of Dana’s and subsequently sought workers’ compensation benefits on the basis that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Renfroe v. Higgins Rack Coating & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Finlay v. Storage Technology Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Smith v. Kelly Labor ServiceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Faith Realty & Development Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. Luby v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Moses v. Diocese of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Evans v. WebsterColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Tunget v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Perkins v. Regional Transportation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Frank C. Klein & Co. v. Colorado Compensation Insurance AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API