Legal Opinion

Leonard v. Houston

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1935No. Appeal, 252PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff obtained a verdict in an action of assumpsit. The defendant filed a motion for a new trial, assigning five specific errors on. the trial, in addition to the stereotyped reasons that the verdict Avas against the evidence and the Aveight of the evidence.

Subsequently one of the jurors came to the trial judge and told him how the verdict had been agreed upon, in such way as to lead the judge to believe that the verdict had not been properly arrived at and was not conscionable; and on that ground alone, after notice to counsel, a new trial was granted. The court did not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Marko v. MendelowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Schroeder v. Gulf Ref. Co., (No. 2)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Baldus v. JeremiasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spegele v. BlumfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Widson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Larimer, Trustee v. Cambria Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API