Widson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Appeals from orders granting a new trial are not encouraged. The Supreme Court has ruled—and this Court has consistently followed the rule—that it will not review an order granting a new trial unless the court below states that it would have refused to grant the new trial hut for reasons distinctly set forth, and then it will confine its review to the reasons so stated: Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. Giacobello, 277 Pa. 530, 538, 121 A. 333. And on page 537 of that case, the court said: “Furthermore, the authorities indicate that because the opinion of the trial court refers to only…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Marko v. MendelowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Schroeder v. Gulf Ref. Co., (No. 2)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Straus v. Rahn (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Baldus v. JeremiasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mirabella v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940