Ferens v. Deere & Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHILL, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment in the above-captioned cases. Diversity jurisdiction is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1982).
Summary of Facts and Procedural History
Plaintiffs, Albert J. Ferens and Margaret L. Ferens, reside in Dunbar, Fayette Coun ty, Pennsylvania. Defendant, Deere & Co., is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Moline, Illinois. Defendant Company is in the business of manufacturing, advertising, selling and distributing combines, which are used to thresh and clean grain.
On or…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Carlson v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Mallory v. Mortgage America, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1999
- Ferens v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Smith v. Morris & ManningDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.