Legal Opinion

Mascarenas v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2003No. 01-225PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Chief Justice.

[T1] Henry Mascarenas (Mascarenas) challenges his conviction for felony interference with a peace officer in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-5-204(b) (LexisNexis 2008) on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence that the police officer was engaged in the lawful performance of his official duties or that the officer suffered bodily injury. He also claims that the State failed to disclose material, exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) and Kerns v. State, 920 P.2d 632 (Wyo.1996). We find sufficient…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. OrtizSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Matthew Scott Worley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Perritt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Doolittle v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Jorge F. Gonzalez-Chavarria v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  5. John Byron Mills v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API