Legal Opinion

In re Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 15, 2019No. 1:18-cv-04361Unknown

1Opinion

DOCUMENT □□□ ELEC] NICAELY: FELED □□ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #:_, op oe SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED □□ (S71 ee rt ee ee er ee ee ee eee x & =. = □□□ : OPINION AND ORDER > GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ : PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS : 18 Civ. 4361 (AKH) In Re Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation : 18 Civ. 5536 > 18 Civ. 5603 : 18 Civ. 5708 : 18 Civ. 5886 : 18 Civ. 6776 : 18 Civ. 9861 >: 18 Civ. 11835 >: 18 Civ. 12293 meme eee enene eeememencneene X ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: Two Novartis companies, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Novartis AG, (both, “Novartis”),…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API