Legal Opinion

Dorsciak v. Gladden

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1967PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

In 1962 the plaintiff pleaded guilty to the crimes of rape of daughter and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. He subsequently filed a petition for post-conviction relief contending, among other things, that his confession and plea of guilty to the rape charge were not voluntarily or understandingly made. He does not seek relief from the contributing conviction. The post-conviction court held a hearing and denied the petition.

We hold that the confession was not voluntarily made.

The defendant was 43 years old at the time of his conviction; he had a seventh grade education. He had no…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Chambers v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Herman v. ClaudySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. State v. NeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BaitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. State v. MendacinoOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. EarpOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API