Legal Opinion

Williams v. Hilton

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court tor Osceola county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the court. Motion to vacate supersedeas.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, J.:

The appeal in this case is from an order dissolving the injunction previously granted. .On the first day of July, 1889, the Chief Justice, on application of appellant, granted a supersedeas, and the matter 'now before us is a motion to vacate the supersedeas. To understand the questions presented on this motion, it is only necessary to give a general outline of the case. Appellant obtained a decree of foreclosure in another suit against Dzialynski and wife et al. Appellee, Hilton, was appointed master to make sale of the lands on which foreclosure was *609had, and did sell, appellant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  2. Smith v. CurtisSupreme Court of Florida · 1883

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willey v. W. J. Hoggson Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Akins v. BetheaSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  3. Tampa Street Railway & Power Co. v. Tampa Suburban RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API