Tampa Street Railway & Power Co. v. Tampa Suburban Railroad
Supreme Court of Florida
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough county. Motion to vacate Sujjersecleas.
1Opinion of the Court
Mabry, J. :
The first ground of the motion to vacate the supersedeas “because it adjudicates matters not complained of in the bill, and which do not appear in the pleadings,” demands no consideration. Counsel do not rely upon it in discussing the motion here; and if by it is meant that the court deviated from the issues presented by the pleadings in adjudicating the contempt matters, it is clear that the appellant company has not appealed from this portion of the order, and has not obtained any supersedeas in reference to it. *402'The second and third grounds of the motion may be «considered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Simmons v. SprattSupreme Court of Florida · 1884
- Railroad Co. v. SchutteSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Williams v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Williams v. HiltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
- Hays v. ToddSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Willey v. W. J. Hoggson Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1925
- First National Bank v. SavareseSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Hathcock v. Societe AnonymeSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Hardee v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1893