Legal Opinion

Hallam Cooley Agency, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1938No. Civ. 12066PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

This is an original application for a writ of prohibition to restrain respondent court from making an order releasing a portion of funds held by the sheriff pursuant to a writ of attachment on the ground that said funds are exempt from attachment.

The material facts are:

October 5, 1938, petitioner filed an action in respondent court against Robert Gleckler and obtained a writ of attachment which the sheriff served upon the Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, which made a return to the sheriff that it was holding $2814.21 belonging to Mr. Gleckler. October 24, 1938, respondent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Vallejo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Sherwood v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Kaiser v. EastonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Henderson v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Navarro v. LippoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API