Legal Opinion
Fairfield v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 21, 1963No. Civ. 26976PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
The petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to restrain the superior court from proceeding in accordance with an order whereby the action of Joseph W. Fairfield v. Jesse A. Hamilton et al., “and each, every and all proceedings pending between any of the parties" was transferred by the presiding judge to the Honorable Alfred Gitelson “for all further proceedings under rule 4, section 18, of the Rules of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County." The petitioner contends that effect should be given to his affidavit filed pursuant to section 170.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
In February of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eagle Maintenance & Supply Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Fairfield v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Peoples Ditch Co. v. Foothill Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Hess v. GrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. EscobedoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. Superior Court (Williams)California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Chappell v. PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Villarruel v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967