Vanmeter v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice
SUE LAGARDE (Retired).
The issue we must decide in this appeal is whether the protections afforded by the Confrontation Clause, as recently interpreted in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), apply at pretrial suppression hearings. For reasons that follow, we conclude they do not. No reversible error having been shown, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
After the trial court denied appellant Reginald Vanmeter’s pretrial motion to suppress, appellant waived a jury and en tered a negotiated guilty plea to the misdemeanor offense…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- State v. TimmermanUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Sheriff v. WitzenburgNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. BrinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Gresham v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.