Legal Opinion

Sheriff v. Witzenburg

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2006No. 45462PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Gibbons, J.:

In this appeal, we address whether the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause and, therefore, Crawford v. Washington,1 apply at a preliminary examination. Respondent Brett Witzenburg was charged with various property crimes against three out-of-state alleged victims. At Witzenburg’s preliminary examination, the State introduced the alleged victims’ affidavits in lieu of their personal appearance, as permitted under NRS 171.197. Witzenburg argued that the affidavits violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against him in light of the United…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Chavez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Hobbs v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. DalyNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Mendoza-Lobos v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API