Legal Opinion

City of Long Beach v. Payne

California Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1935No. L. A. 15089PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The question involved in this proceeding is whether the county of Los Angeles can legally apply a portion of the money allocated to it from the “Motor Vehicle Fund” to the improvement and repair of certain canals in that certain tract or subdivision known as “Naples” and located within the City of Long Beach in said county of Los Angeles. No question is raised as to the right of said county to expend money allocated to it from the motor vehicle fund in the repair and maintenance of an ordinary street or highway within the corporate limits of a city, but the contention of respondent is that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. In Re NowakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Wattson v. EldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Board of Commissioners v. CastetterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Southern Kansas Railway Co. v. City of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Hughes v. PairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Cedars of Lebanon Hospital v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Fair Political Practices Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Legislature v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API