Legal Opinion

Lexington Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Burr Computer Environments, Inc. and J. Supor and Sons Trucking and Rigging Co. v. Daybreak Express, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2013No. 11-0597PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

We grant in part the limited motion for rehearing by respondent Daybreak Express, Inc., withdraw our opinion of August 31, 2012, and substitute the following opinion in its place.

The principal question in this case is whether, for purposes of Section 16.068 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, an action for cargo damage against a common carrier, brought under the Car-mack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 14706, relates back to an action for breach of an agreement to settle the cargo-damage claim. The an swer depends on whether the cargo-damage claim is, in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Hoskins v. Bekins Van LinesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  5. Leonard v. Texaco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Walker v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. City of New Braunfels, Texas v. Carowest Land, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2014
  3. Chavez v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. O'Cheskey v. CitiGroup Global Markets, Inc. (In re American Housing Foundation)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
  5. 17714 Bannister v. TAS Environmental Services LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API