Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bertram

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 7, 2003No. 1010892PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant Patricia Norman Bertram was convicted of violating Subsections (a)(2) and (h) of Section 32-5A-191, Ala. Code 1975, "felony driving under the influence." The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed in an opinion, Bertram v. State,884 So.2d 886 (Ala.Crim.App. 2001).

We granted Bertram's petition for a writ of certiorari to address a single question of first impression: whether Subsection (h) of Section 32-5A-191 means for prior out-of-state convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol to count toward the total of convictions necessary to constitute the felony defined by that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Castillo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. ResnickSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Clements v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Ankrom v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  2. State of Alabama v. Thornal Lee Adams.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  3. Ankrom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  4. Hankins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Ex Parte HolbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API