Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Chappell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcCurdy, J.

This appeal on questions of law is directed to the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas in sustaining the demurrer of the plaintiff to the second defense contained in the defendant’s answer to the plaintiff’s amended petition.

The plaintiff is seeking to recover a judgment in the sum of $237, with interest, against the defendant on a promissory note which the defendant as payee endorsed to the plaintiff. This amended petition contains the allegation that on January 28, 1926, George Dailey, Audrey Dailey and Lewis Dailey executed and delivered the note set forth in the amended petition to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Everding & Farrell v. ToftOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Romero v. HopewellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Finance Corp. v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. First National Bank v. DrakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Highleyman v. McDowell Motor Car Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Upton v. Heiselt Const. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API