Everding & Farrell v. Toft
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Calvin U. Gantenbein, Judge. This is an action by Everding & Farrell, a corporation, against John F. Toft, J. L. Hoffman and others. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff against John F. Toft, and one against plaintiff in favor of J. L. Hoffman for his costs and disbursements. From that part of the judgment in favor of defendant Hoffman, plaintiff appeals. Respondent files motion to dismiss the appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moore.
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. In order to understand the question involved, it is necessary to state the substance of the facts upon which a solution of the inquiry depends:
The defendant J. L. Hoffman on August 7, 1912, executed to the defendant the Colombian Timber Company, a corporation, his promissory note for $5,000, payable in one year, with interest at the rate of 8 per *4cent per annum. Prior to the maturity of the instrument the defendants John F. Toft, John F. Shorey and the payee in due course indorsed the note for value, and thereupon the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bush v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by22 opinions
- American National Bank v. KerleyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Bank of Jordan Valley v. DuncanOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Torosian v. PaulosArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Union Oil Co. of Calif. v. LullOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Redfield v. WellsIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.