Legal Opinion
Marshall Associated Contractors, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 1, 1994No. 93-665CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This contract case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1). Defendant, the United States, on behalf of the United States Department of Interior (DOI), Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), states that plaintiff is involved in a similar action pending in another court. Therefore, defendant moves to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1500 (1988). Additionally, defendant moves to dismiss plaintiff’s monetary claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the claim was not presented to a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Medina Construction, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Harbuck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Bowers Investment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Roxco, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- American Telecom Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.