United States v. Fred Eubanks, Eugene Martinez, Leroy Jones, Henry D. Yanez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants and three others were indicted on charges of conspiracy to distribute heroin and to possess heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Appellants were jointly tried and convicted by a jury. On appeal, they raise numerous claims of error, the most serious of which is founded on the alleged bias of one of the trial jurors. It is unnecessary for us to discuss all the issues raised by appellants, because we hold that the district court erred in denying appellant’s motion for a new trial based on juror bias. We do consider appellants’ claims of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Turner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Fiswick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by197 opinions
- United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Alfred R. Dyer v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Russell A. Tinsley v. Bob BorgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Kenneth Joe Whitten, John Elmer Gaiefsky, Jack Wayne Gish, Richard Lawrence ShimelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.