Legal Opinion
In re Urethane Antitrust Litigation
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 28, 2008No. 04-MD-1616-JWLPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*630MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
This multidistrict litigation consists of numerous putative class action lawsuits in which plaintiffs claim that defendants engaged in unlawful price fixing conspiracies with respect to urethane chemical products in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. The court originally consolidated two separate sets of cases — the Polyester Polyol Cases and the Polyether Polyol Cases. The parties have settled the Polyester Polyol Cases, and those cases have been dismissed. This Memorandum and Order relates to the Polyether Polyol Cases, in…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ross v. American Express Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Rushing v. Alon USA, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Jackson v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.