Legal Opinion
In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust Litigation
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 28, 2012No. Civil Action No. RDB -10-0318PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge.
This case concerns an alleged price-fixing conspiracy in the market for titanium dioxide. Plaintiffs Haley Paint Company and Isaac Industries, Inc., and Intervening Plaintiff East Coast Colorants, LLC d/b/a Breen Color Concentrates (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) claim that Defendants E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. (“DuPont”), Huntsman International LLC (“Huntsman”), Kronos Worldwide Inc. (“Kronos”), and Millennium Inorganic Chemicals, Inc. (“Millennium”) (collectively, “Defendants”) engaged in an unlawful conspiracy in violation of Section 1…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Wonasue v. University of Maryland Alumni Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
- In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- In re Mushroom Direct Purchaser Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.