Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Lichter v. Henke Const. Co.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided September 18, 1940No. 74PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

This is a suit under a contractor’s bond to the United States under the provisions of Sections 270a, 270b and 270c, Title 40‘ U.S.C.A.

It is contended by the complainants that as subcontractors they were required to furnish certain materials and labor in the way of extras and that, moreover, due to-the fault of the principal contractor as well as that of the United States, the completion of the work was negligently delayed. Because of such extras and delay the complainants have sued on the bond of the principal contractor.

By a second count they ask for damages-for breach…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. United States ex rel. Pacific Coast Engineering Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sun Insurance Co. of New York v. Diversified Engineers, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1965
  2. United States v. Ramstad Construction Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1961
  3. United States v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of MarylandDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1956
  4. Airport Construction & Materials, Inc. v. BivensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. United States Ex Rel. Jones Contracting Co. v. SkilkenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API