Legal Opinion
United States v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided August 22, 1956No. Civ. A. 4150PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action under the provisions of the Miller’ Act, 40 U.S. C.A. § 270a et seq., in the name of the United States and against the contracting firm of Miller & Long, and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, the surety on the bond of Miller & Long, to recover for work performed for and equipment supplied to Miller & Long in connection with the performance of its contract with the United States, dated September 27,1951, for the re-location of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company railroad lines around the Lake Charles Air Force Base.
There is no…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Continental Casualty Co. v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- United States Ex Rel. Susi Contracting Co. v. Zara Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Albert Pick & Co. v. StringerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Transamerica Insurance Company v. Red Top Metal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Ramstad Construction Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1961
- Water Works, Gas & Sewer Board of the City of Oneonta, Inc. v. P. A. Buchanan Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- United States Ex Rel. James F. O'Neil Co. v. Malan Construction Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1958
- United States Ex Rel. Moron Towing Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.