Legal Opinion

Beatty v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 21, 1985No. 66779PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

This is a direct appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of appellant’s First Amended Petition. The trial court ruled that the statute of limitations for election contests barred appellant’s petition. § 115.577, RSMo 1978. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The facts are these: The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (hereafter MSD) adopted Ordinance 5630 on May 23, 1984, calling for a special election on the proposition of whether MSD could issue clean water revenue bonds in the amount of $60 million. Approval of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Harold B. Hughes and Nancy J. Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Prokopf v. WhaleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. BCI Corp. v. Charlebois Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Union Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. McCollum v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. Zweig v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  4. Dotson v. KanderSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  5. Foster v. EvertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API