Beatty v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
This is a direct appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of appellant’s First Amended Petition. The trial court ruled that the statute of limitations for election contests barred appellant’s petition. § 115.577, RSMo 1978. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The facts are these: The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (hereafter MSD) adopted Ordinance 5630 on May 23, 1984, calling for a special election on the proposition of whether MSD could issue clean water revenue bonds in the amount of $60 million. Approval of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Harold B. Hughes and Nancy J. Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Prokopf v. WhaleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- BCI Corp. v. Charlebois Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- State ex rel. Union Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- McCollum v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Zweig v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Dotson v. KanderSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
- Foster v. EvertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.