Jaup v. Olmstead
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
Plaintiffs Sadik Jaup and Clara Jaup entered into an agreement with defendant Charles M. Olmstead in September of 1949, to purchase 2 stores in the city of Detroit. This agreement stated in part:
“It is understood that the partitions and 2 gas heating plants (are considered as part of the purchase price and shall remain on this property).”
In October, Olmstead conveyed the' property to plaintiffs. He remained in possession as a tenant of plaintiffs until September of 1950, when he vacated the premises. Plaintiffs charge that when he did so he “took with him portions of the heating unit plants,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Steggles v. National Discount Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Cole v. Cole Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Multiplex Concrete MacHinery Co. v. SaxerMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Gallagher v. Studebaker CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kaiser Trading Co. v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Kent v. BellMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Eberspaecher North America, Inc. v. Van-Rob, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Weinhardt v. Addison Community SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Contech Casting, LLC v. ZF Steering Systems, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013