Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Conservation Commission
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided November 29, 2004No. 02-P-1565PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuffly, J.
The plaintiffs abut a thirty-four acre parcel of land on Oyster Pond in Edgartown,3 on which the trustee of Tarob *540Realty Tmst (Tarob Trust) proposes to build a large residence. Tarob Trust filed a notice of intent pursuant to the Edgartown wetlands protection by-law regarding the project and, following extended public hearings, the Edgartown Conservation Commission (commission) granted an order of conditions. The plaintiffs brought this action in the nature of certiorari pursuant to G. L. c. 249, § 4, appealing, so far as is relevant here, that aspect of the commission’s decision based on the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ginther v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Selectmen of ConcordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Lovequist v. Conservation Commission of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Enos v. Secretary of Environmental AffairsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- FIC Homes of Blackstone, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Higby/Fulton Vineyard, LLC v. Board of Health of TisburyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Kelley v. Cambridge Historical CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- Lippman v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Walpole Country Club v. Board of Health of SharonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Conte v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.